rsc: (Default)
rsc ([personal profile] rsc) wrote2004-04-08 11:55 am

What a difference a year makes

Burningbright just wanted to let everyone know how happy he is about the Tigers' performance to date.

I haven't had the heart to tell him that it can't last.
jss: Me (Default)

[personal profile] jss 2004-04-08 09:01 am (UTC)(link)
It might. Remember 1984? (The year, not the book.)

[identity profile] spwebdesign.livejournal.com 2004-04-08 12:45 pm (UTC)(link)
Don't remind me of 1984! I'm glad they came back to beat the Cubbies, but why is it they always run into a juggernaut in the World Series?!?
jss: Me (Default)

[personal profile] jss 2004-04-08 01:12 pm (UTC)(link)
What always? 1968, baybee!

[identity profile] spwebdesign.livejournal.com 2004-04-08 06:20 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm a Padres fan. I'm glad the Padres came back to beat the Cubbies in the NLCS, but every time they've made it to the World Series, they've run into a juggernaut -- first the Tigers in '84 and then the Yankees in '96. I wish for once they'd face a good team instead of a team for the ages.
jss: Me (Default)

[personal profile] jss 2004-04-08 09:39 pm (UTC)(link)
Ah, but this is a thread about the Tigers, as evidenced by Burningbright's picture on the original entry. 1968, 1984, and 2004! It's the Year of the Tigers!

[identity profile] rsc.livejournal.com 2004-04-08 02:10 pm (UTC)(link)
My baseball memory is missing the years 1965-1987, except for occasional brief flashes of 1986 (which I do my best to suppress).
jss: Me (Default)

[personal profile] jss 2004-04-08 02:28 pm (UTC)(link)
I just remember the 30-and-4 start in '84 and that they won in '68. I've got a signed-by-the-team 1968 Tigers ball somewhere, actually.

[identity profile] rsc.livejournal.com 2004-04-08 02:11 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, they won again today. I think a lot of bookies will be surprised (and unhappy) if they end up with a winning season, however.
jss: Me (Default)

[personal profile] jss 2004-04-08 02:29 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm remarkably unconcerned with the happiness of bookies.

[identity profile] rsc.livejournal.com 2004-04-08 03:27 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, well, me too, but they tend to have a pretty good grasp of probabilities.
susandennis: (entry)

[personal profile] susandennis 2004-04-08 12:48 pm (UTC)(link)
If you tell me that the Mariners' losing streak can't last, I'll believe you. I will. I promise.

[identity profile] rsc.livejournal.com 2004-04-08 02:11 pm (UTC)(link)
The Mariners' losing streak can't last.
susandennis: (entry)

[personal profile] susandennis 2004-04-08 02:33 pm (UTC)(link)
You are very good. Your note just came in. They are in the 4th and they are not losing. Thank you!!!!!

[identity profile] rsc.livejournal.com 2004-04-08 03:29 pm (UTC)(link)
It's too bad [livejournal.com profile] lcohen didn't ask -- I'd have been more than happy to help her team out today.
lcohen: (Default)

[personal profile] lcohen 2004-04-15 09:44 pm (UTC)(link)
we did our best. a split's not too bad. our bullpen has my stomach in knots, however.

[identity profile] drevilmoo.livejournal.com 2004-04-08 05:38 pm (UTC)(link)
I know it's not September yet, but have the Red Sox blown it yet?

Context

[identity profile] bratman.livejournal.com 2004-04-08 07:46 pm (UTC)(link)
So I read this and I think "well burningbright just has to be one of their other stuffed creatures that is getting laid on a regular basis by this tiger creature".

I like my interpretation better than reality.

Re: Context

[identity profile] rsc.livejournal.com 2004-04-09 08:17 am (UTC)(link)
How could someone named "Burningbright" not be a tiger?

I like my interpretation better than reality.

Like this needed saying.