rsc: (Default)
[personal profile] rsc
Burningbright just wanted to let everyone know how happy he is about the Tigers' performance to date.

I haven't had the heart to tell him that it can't last.

Date: 2004-04-08 09:01 am (UTC)
jss: Me (Default)
From: [personal profile] jss
It might. Remember 1984? (The year, not the book.)

Date: 2004-04-08 12:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] spwebdesign.livejournal.com
Don't remind me of 1984! I'm glad they came back to beat the Cubbies, but why is it they always run into a juggernaut in the World Series?!?

Date: 2004-04-08 01:12 pm (UTC)
jss: Me (Default)
From: [personal profile] jss
What always? 1968, baybee!

Date: 2004-04-08 06:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] spwebdesign.livejournal.com
I'm a Padres fan. I'm glad the Padres came back to beat the Cubbies in the NLCS, but every time they've made it to the World Series, they've run into a juggernaut -- first the Tigers in '84 and then the Yankees in '96. I wish for once they'd face a good team instead of a team for the ages.

Date: 2004-04-08 09:39 pm (UTC)
jss: Me (Default)
From: [personal profile] jss
Ah, but this is a thread about the Tigers, as evidenced by Burningbright's picture on the original entry. 1968, 1984, and 2004! It's the Year of the Tigers!

Date: 2004-04-08 02:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rsc.livejournal.com
My baseball memory is missing the years 1965-1987, except for occasional brief flashes of 1986 (which I do my best to suppress).

Date: 2004-04-08 02:28 pm (UTC)
jss: Me (Default)
From: [personal profile] jss
I just remember the 30-and-4 start in '84 and that they won in '68. I've got a signed-by-the-team 1968 Tigers ball somewhere, actually.

Date: 2004-04-08 02:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rsc.livejournal.com
Well, they won again today. I think a lot of bookies will be surprised (and unhappy) if they end up with a winning season, however.

Date: 2004-04-08 02:29 pm (UTC)
jss: Me (Default)
From: [personal profile] jss
I'm remarkably unconcerned with the happiness of bookies.

Date: 2004-04-08 03:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rsc.livejournal.com
Yeah, well, me too, but they tend to have a pretty good grasp of probabilities.

Date: 2004-04-08 12:48 pm (UTC)
susandennis: (entry)
From: [personal profile] susandennis
If you tell me that the Mariners' losing streak can't last, I'll believe you. I will. I promise.

Date: 2004-04-08 02:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rsc.livejournal.com
The Mariners' losing streak can't last.

Date: 2004-04-08 02:33 pm (UTC)
susandennis: (entry)
From: [personal profile] susandennis
You are very good. Your note just came in. They are in the 4th and they are not losing. Thank you!!!!!

Date: 2004-04-08 03:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rsc.livejournal.com
It's too bad [livejournal.com profile] lcohen didn't ask -- I'd have been more than happy to help her team out today.

Date: 2004-04-15 09:44 pm (UTC)
lcohen: (Default)
From: [personal profile] lcohen
we did our best. a split's not too bad. our bullpen has my stomach in knots, however.

Date: 2004-04-08 05:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] drevilmoo.livejournal.com
I know it's not September yet, but have the Red Sox blown it yet?

Context

Date: 2004-04-08 07:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bratman.livejournal.com
So I read this and I think "well burningbright just has to be one of their other stuffed creatures that is getting laid on a regular basis by this tiger creature".

I like my interpretation better than reality.

Re: Context

Date: 2004-04-09 08:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rsc.livejournal.com
How could someone named "Burningbright" not be a tiger?

I like my interpretation better than reality.

Like this needed saying.

Profile

rsc: (Default)
rsc

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324 252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 28th, 2025 07:21 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios